I dig me some lesbian koalas. |
I've been editing my romance novella this week, and I think I've mentioned here before that me and a few CPs/general friends have been discussing how I should market it. Should I market it just as a romance with a couple graphic scenes, or as an erotic romance? To me, marketing it as an erotic romance means there's smutsmutsmut all over the place, and if that's what you're looking for, you may be disappointed to see the first ~smut~ doesn't pop up until halfway through the novella. Here's the thing: there are two very good places I could insert some good ol' lady x lady smut earlier on in the novella, but I didn't because it wasn't really plot related. I'm thinking I may write them anyway after I finish this edit just to see how I feel about them in the overall story. But I wouldn't have thought of it at all if it weren't me thinking ahead towards marketing. I don't know. I'm talking in circles now.
But yes, smut has been on the brain all week. Ain't being (lonely, sad) 25 grand.
From what you said, I would market it as romance without the erotic. After all, romance can be really steamy, but "erotic" makes it sound like there is smut for smut's sake.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the input. In my research there seems to be a very thin line between (adult) romance and erotica. Of course, all readers aren't going to be happy across the board (really? damn.) but I see a lot of "there was no indication this romance had graphic sex in it, and I'm not happy" and "there wasn't enough sex in this erotica for me and I feel it's not what other erotica readers would look for, just romance". I'll market it as romance first, for sure, since to me "romance" implies a story about a relationship, which this is. But there's also a lot of graphic sex even without editing to add more where it's otherwise fade-to-black, so I would be uncomfortable not mentioning that otherwise. (Also, my planned cover image implies steaminess anyway.)
Deleteblah rambling!